DoneChartHow long, at what temperature, for the cut and weight you actually have.

How Many Grams in a Cup? It Depends Entirely on What Is in It

A cup of honey weighs 340 grams. A cup of rolled oats weighs 90. Both are one cup, and that is the entire reason serious recipes give grams.

One measure, a wide range of weights
One measure, a wide range of weights

There is no single answer, because a cup measures volume and a gram measures weight. The number depends on what is in the cup.

One cup of Grams
Water 237
Milk 245
All-purpose flour, spooned & levelled 120
Bread flour 120
Cake flour 114
Whole wheat flour 113
Granulated sugar 200
Brown sugar, packed 213
Powdered sugar, sifted 120
Butter 227
Vegetable oil 218
Honey 340
Rolled oats 90
Cocoa powder 85
Rice, uncooked 185
Chocolate chips 170
Chopped nuts 120
Grated parmesan 100
Breadcrumbs, dry 108

The same cup, five different weights

Honey is nearly four times the weight of rolled oats at the same volume. That range is why a recipe written in cups is a recipe with a built-in tolerance, and why a recipe written in grams is not.

Flour is the one that moves

Every figure above is fixed except flour, and flour is the ingredient that most decides whether a dough works.

How the cup is filled Grams
Spooned in, levelled 120
Spooned, lightly settled 125
Scooped from the bag 140
Scooped and packed 150

That is a 25% spread on the same cup of the same flour. Sugar varies by 2 to 3% because the crystals are hard and do not compress; flour is a fine powder holding a great deal of squeezable air.

American recipes written in the last decade generally assume 120 to 125 g per cup. Older ones assume scooping, closer to 140. Almost none say which, and a bread that comes out dry and dense is often nothing more than that difference.

Converting a cup recipe to weights

Weighing removes the question

Work through the ingredient list once, replace each cup measure with the gram figure above, and write it in the margin. From then on that recipe is repeatable.

Two things make it easier than it sounds:

Weigh into the bowl cumulatively. Bowl on the scale, tare, add flour to 360 g, tare, add sugar to 200 g, tare, and so on. One bowl, no measuring cups, nothing to wash.

Liquids can stay in cups if you prefer. Water and milk do not vary with how they are poured, so there is nothing to gain — the accuracy problem is entirely with powders.

What a scale changes beyond accuracy

The accuracy is the stated reason and the smaller one. Three practical changes matter more day to day.

Fewer things to wash. A set of nested measuring cups and spoons is six or seven items per bake. A scale and one bowl is two.

Sticky ingredients stop being a problem. Honey, syrup, peanut butter and molasses all leave a measurable amount behind in a cup, and no amount of scraping recovers all of it. Weighed straight into the bowl, none of it is lost and there is nothing to scrape.

Scaling becomes arithmetic. Multiplying 360 g by 1.5 is trivial. Multiplying three cups by 1.5 gives four and a half cups, which is fine, but multiplying ⅔ cup by 1.5 gives a number you then have to translate back into spoons.

Why grams rather than ounces

The increments are ten times finer. An ounce is about 28 grams, so a scale reading in whole ounces cannot distinguish 120 g of flour from 133 g — a difference that matters.

Every serious modern recipe gives grams for that reason, and every kitchen scale sold has a gram mode.

The metric cup, which is a different cup

Australia and New Zealand use a 250 mL cup, against the US 237 mL. That is about 5% larger.

Five percent is invisible in a soup and visible in a cake. Where a recipe's origin is unclear and the quantities are large, the gram figures on this page are the safer route precisely because they carry no country with them.

The same divide runs through the fluid ounce and the tablespoon, where Australia's is a third larger than everyone else's.

Work it out

D
DoneChart

How long, at what temperature, for the cut and weight you actually have. — DoneChart. Editorial policy